Debunking the Debunkers

Let's Get Empirical

 

Link

 

David Ray Griffin's answer to Popular Mechanics and other defenders of the official story.

 

9/11 and the British Broadcasting Conspiracy

 

Link

 

David Shayler's response to the first BBC Conspiracy Files hit piece.

 

NIST Exposed

 

Videos by Xenomorph911WTC, SOSnUSA, ae911truth & corbettreport.

 

NIST debunked with basic physics, video evidence and common sense.

 

A summary of NIST's lies and distortions:

• They denied molten metal and sustained high temperatures at Ground Zero.
• Their WTC7 thermal expansion hypothesis is a "new phonemenon" which has no historical basis.
• They ruled out conventional demolition on the basis that no explosive charges were heard and no window breakage occured in nearby buildings but didn't even consider alternative forms of demolition.
• They admit freefall acceleration but do not explain it.
• There doesn't seem to be any reason for choosing the starting point that they did except to make the time come out as 5.4 seconds. They could have started it when the east penthouse collapsed, when the west penthouse started to fal or when the roofline started to fall. It's not until about 0.5 seconds after they start the clock that there is any noticeable movement at all.
• They had no steel from WTC7, as it was all shipped off to China and melted down; a coverup in itself. Their investigation has been compared to doing an autopsy without the corpse.
• Their entire investigation of WTC7 is based on computer models. The modelling software they used is commerically available, but they have not released the raw data they used to generate their simulations; they have only released the renderings themselves. It is therefore impossible for independent investigators to review their work to check its realism.
• Their report therefore, is nothing more than a fancy, expensive coverup; and if their covering up WTC7, what else are they covering up?

Interestingly enough, there also happen to be some pretty alarming connections between NIST and explosive nano-thermites. See Kevin Ryan's paper The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites.

 

Ae911truth has filed a Freedom of Information Act request and is currently working on obtaining the raw data NIST used to generate their computer simulations. For more information visit ae911truth.org.

 

The BBC's WTC7 Hit Pieces

 

Link

 

A response to the BBC's WTC7 hit piece Conspiracy Files: The Third Tower.

 

In the documentary, the BBC misrepresent Barry Jennings' entire timeline. First, they claim Barry didn't arrive until after the second plane hit, when in reality he was inside WTC7 on the 23rd floor when the second plane hit. They also claim that the explosion that trapped him was actually just debris from the North Tower's collapse, even though he specifically stated in the interview with the Loose Change crew that it was before either tower had collapsed, as he was on the eighth floor when they both collapsed. He also claims in the BBC documentary that the reason he asked the interview be removed from the film was because they were misrepresenting him and taking quotes out of context. The real reason he asked the interview be removed was because he was being threatened. You can watch Barry's full, uncut testimony here.

 

No misrepresentation, no quotes taken out of context, nothing. The BBC, by the way won't release their uncut interview with him. What are they hiding?

 

In October 2008, they aired an updated version entitled Conspiracy Files: The Truth Behind the Third Tower. The new version is largely the same, except they include some of NIST's "findings", they air Larry Silverstein's "pull it" quote in full and they include testimony from Michael Hess, who confirms the official timeline. What they don't tell you is that about a month before they interviewed Hess, Barry "died". Is it any wonder he changed his story?!

 

The whole thing is full of bias and emotional manipulation. They make it seem like truthers are hurting the victim's family members and firefighters who were there on the day. They completely ignore the family members who do believe it was an inside job, like Bill Doyle and Bob McIlvaine and they ignore the first responders who question the official story, such as Kevin McPadden and Craig Bartmer. A list of survivors, first responders and family members who question the official story can be found here.

 

They also show clips of Richard Gage playing with cardboard boxes and Dylan Avery swearing like a hormonal teenager. I'm sure they had hours of footage of them to choose from!

 

Other

 

• I'm Not A Conspiracy Theorist!
• Exploding Paint?

My 9/11 Debunkers Blog Posts

Wikipedia renames 9/11 controlled demolition page to a "conspiracy theory"